.iml file keep changing
Hi,
My project's .iml file is keep changing. But when look at the difference to last revision, the difference is like following:
-- a/.idea/aimm3.iml +++ b/.idea/aimm3.iml @@ -146,15 +146,15 @@ </content> <orderEntry type="inheritedJdk" /> <orderEntry type="sourceFolder" forTests="false" /> - <orderEntry type="library" scope="PROVIDED" name="rdoc (v3.9.4, RVM: ruby-1.9.2-p290 [aimm3]) [gem]" level="application" /> <orderEntry type="library" scope="PROVIDED" name="awesome_print (v0.4.0, RVM: ruby-1.9.2-p290 [aimm3]) [gem]" level="application" /> - <orderEntry type="library" scope="PROVIDED" name="rails (v3.1.0, RVM: ruby-1.9.2-p290 [aimm3]) [gem]" level="application" /> + <orderEntry type="library" scope="PROVIDED" name="rdoc (v3.9.4, RVM: ruby-1.9.2-p290 [aimm3]) [gem]" level="application" /> <orderEntry type="library" scope="PROVIDED" name="json (v1.5.4, RVM: ruby-1.9.2-p290 [aimm3]) [gem]" level="application" /> + <orderEntry type="library" scope="PROVIDED" name="rails (v3.1.0, RVM: ruby-1.9.2-p290 [aimm3]) [gem]" level="application" /> <orderEntry type="library" scope="PROVIDED" name="ffi (v1.0.9, RVM: ruby-1.9.2-p290 [aimm3]) [gem]" level="application" /> <orderEntry type="library" scope="PROVIDED" name="erubis (v2.7.0, RVM: ruby-1.9.2-p290 [aimm3]) [gem]" level="application" /> <orderEntry type="library" scope="PROVIDED" name="transitions (v0.0.10, RVM: ruby-1.9.2-p290 [aimm3]) [gem]" level="application" /> - <orderEntry type="library" scope="PROVIDED" name="database_cleaner (v0.6.7, RVM: ruby-1.9.2-p290 [aimm3]) [gem]" level="application" /> <orderEntry type="library" scope="PROVIDED" name="archive-tar-minitar (v0.5.2, RVM: ruby-1.9.2-p290 [aimm3]) [gem]" level="application" /> + <orderEntry type="library" scope="PROVIDED" name="database_cleaner (v0.6.7, RVM: ruby-1.9.2-p290 [aimm3]) [gem]" level="application" />
(following lines omitted)
As you see, the difference is just the order of the entry.
Why does this happening? Does the order important?
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Hi Shigeya,
we already have issue request in our bugtracker. Feel free to watch it and track it's progress