What happened to Ivy support?
I was told we could expect Ivy support in Idea X. I can't find mention of it anywhere, and after downloading it just now sure enough there doesn't seem to be any. What happened? This is a pretty big hole IMO, as none of the available Ivy plugins are actively maintained nor up to snuff.
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Hello Thomas,
Unfortunately we didn't have the resources to implement Ivy support for IDEA
X. It's still under consideration for future releases of IntelliJ IDEA.
--
Dmitry Jemerov
Development Lead
JetBrains, Inc.
http://www.jetbrains.com/
"Develop with Pleasure!"
Frankly speaking, I wish our project migrated to Maven and got rid of the whole Ant+Ivy malarkey. However, as it's not planned for the near future, I am using IvyIDEA 0.9-beta2 at the moment, and it kind of does the job, although it is a far cry from the excellent Maven support in the latest versions. There is a later version of plugin available, but it is not available through plugin manager. You need to download it yourself and unpack into plugins directory.
I did a quick search on the YouTrack, and this ticket cropped up:
http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issue/IDEA-58685?query=ivy
Vote for it if you wish.
IvyIDEA beta2 is what I use also, as it seems to be the only even moderately successful solution. But it's still a far cry from good, and like pretty much all the Ivy plugins, seems abandoned from a development standpoint.
As for Ant + Ivy vs Maven, I agree that I tend to prefer the latter. But Ivy works well for us and clearly it's usage is widespread enough to warrant integration IMO (which Eclipse already has I might add).
We're looking at switching to Gradle - which uses Ivy or Maven (we'll
keep our corporate Ivy repository).
Gradle's similar to Maven, but can extend/wrap your existing Ant or
Maven scripts, so it's easy to migrate. More powerful than Ant, much
more pliable than Maven. And it has an Idea plugin which
generates/updates your Idea project, so your libs are in sync.
Doug
On 12/1/10 17:46, Sergei Ivanov wrote:
>
>
>