once JetBrain's icon painters get going, they are hard to stop. It has always been that way. And once in a while they are hit by the irresistible urge to renovate some icons..
If you have not noticed, there are now TWO lightbulbs - one is yellow (meaning: IDEA has some functionality available at caret, as in "If you fancy to split this declaration into declaration and assignment, I can do it for you"), and the other is red with excl mark in it (meaning: "you have a problem in your code, but I have an idea how to fix it").
Which of the two icons is ugly? Or both?
Friendly, Dmitry
Guillaume Pothier wrote:
I mean, I also like the functionality, and liked better the yellow icon that was serving the same purpose since Ariadna...
Amnon I. Govrin wrote:
>> So? I like the functionality. I am sure they'll get the icon right soon >> enough. >> >> "Guillaume Pothier" <gpothier@free.fr> wrote in message >> news:bev13p$bvi$2@is.intellij.net... >>> I definitely do agree! >>> >>> Michael Seele wrote: >>> >>> > >>>
-- Dmitry Lomov IntelliJ Labs / JetBrains Inc. http://www.intellij.com "Develop with pleasure!"
If you have not noticed, there are now TWO lightbulbs - one is yellow (meaning: IDEA has some functionality available at caret, as in "If you fancy to split this declaration into declaration and assignment, I can do it for you"), and the other is red with excl mark in it (meaning: "you have a problem in your code, but I have an idea how to fix it").
Actually this is not quite right Dmitry because after I added a method and had something like:
public static void setUserName(String name){...}
and I place the carret at name, I get a red lightbulb which suggests I need to remove the name parameter... that's not wrong code, but in this case it's a wrong suggestion based on what you're describing above.
So to me it's not ugly, it's bad behavior.
R
Which of the two icons is ugly? Or both?
Friendly, Dmitry
Guillaume Pothier wrote:
>>I mean, I also like the functionality, and liked better the yellow icon >>that was serving the same purpose since Ariadna... >> >> >>Amnon I. Govrin wrote: >> >> >>>So? I like the functionality. I am sure they'll get the icon right soon >>>enough. >>> >>>"Guillaume Pothier" <gpothier@free.fr> wrote in message >>>news:bev13p$bvi$2@is.intellij.net... >>> >>>>I definitely do agree! >>>> >>>>Michael Seele wrote: >>>> >>>>
If you have not noticed, there are now TWO lightbulbs - one is yellow (meaning: IDEA has some functionality available at caret, as in "If you fancy to split this declaration into declaration and assignment, I can do it for you"), and the other is red with excl mark in it (meaning: "you have a problem in your code, but I have an idea how to fix it").
Actually this is not quite right Dmitry because after I added a method and had something like:
public static void setUserName(String name){...}
and I place the carret at name, I get a red lightbulb which suggests I need to remove the name parameter... that's not wrong code, but in this case it's a wrong suggestion based on what you're describing above.
So to me it's not ugly, it's bad behavior.
R
Which of the two icons is ugly? Or both?
Friendly, Dmitry
Guillaume Pothier wrote:
>>I mean, I also like the functionality, and liked better the yellow icon >>that was serving the same purpose since Ariadna... >> >> >>Amnon I. Govrin wrote: >> >> >>>So? I like the functionality. I am sure they'll get the icon right soon >>>enough. >>> >>>"Guillaume Pothier" <gpothier@free.fr> wrote in message >>>news:bev13p$bvi$2@is.intellij.net... >>> >>>>I definitely do agree! >>>> >>>>Michael Seele wrote: >>>> >>>>
Actually this is not quite right Dmitry because after I added a method and had something like:
public static void setUserName(String name){...}
and I place the carret at name, I get a red lightbulb which suggests I need to remove the name parameter... that's not wrong code, but in this case it's a wrong suggestion based on what you're describing above.
So to me it's not ugly, it's bad behavior.
Dmitry Lomov wrote:
If you have not noticed, there are now TWO lightbulbs - one is yellow (meaning: IDEA has some functionality available at caret, as in "If you fancy to split this declaration into declaration and assignment, I can do it for you"), and the other is red with excl mark in it (meaning: "you have a problem in your code, but I have an idea how to fix it").
Which of the two icons is ugly? Or both?
Friendly, Dmitry
Guillaume Pothier wrote:
>>I mean, I also like the functionality, and liked better the yellow icon >>that was serving the same purpose since Ariadna... >> >> >>Amnon I. Govrin wrote: >> >> >>>So? I like the functionality. I am sure they'll get the icon right soon >>>enough. >>> >>>"Guillaume Pothier" <gpothier@free.fr> wrote in message >>>news:bev13p$bvi$2@is.intellij.net... >>> >>>>I definitely do agree! >>>> >>>>Michael Seele wrote: >>>> >>>>
Sorry about the spam my mail server was giving me a hard time and didn't see the emails fly out.
R
Robert S. Sfeir wrote:
Actually this is not quite right Dmitry because after I added a method and had something like:
public static void setUserName(String name){...}
and I place the carret at name, I get a red lightbulb which suggests I need to remove the name parameter... that's not wrong code, but in this case it's a wrong suggestion based on what you're describing above.
So to me it's not ugly, it's bad behavior.
Dmitry Lomov wrote:
>> If you have not noticed, there are now TWO lightbulbs - one is yellow >> (meaning: IDEA has some functionality available at caret, as in "If you >> fancy to split this declaration into declaration and assignment, I can do >> it for you"), and the other is red with excl mark in it (meaning: "you >> have >> a problem in your code, but I have an idea how to fix it"). >> >> Which of the two icons is ugly? Or both? >> >> Friendly, >> Dmitry >> >> Guillaume Pothier wrote: >> >> >>> I mean, I also like the functionality, and liked better the yellow icon >>> that was serving the same purpose since Ariadna... >>> >>> >>> Amnon I. Govrin wrote: >>> >>> >>>> So? I like the functionality. I am sure they'll get the icon right soon >>>> enough. >>>> >>>> "Guillaume Pothier" <gpothier@free.fr> wrote in message >>>> news:bev13p$bvi$2@is.intellij.net... >>>> >>>>> I definitely do agree! >>>>> >>>>> Michael Seele wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>
Actually this is not quite right Dmitry because after I added a method and had something like:
public static void setUserName(String name){...}
and I place the carret at name, I get a red lightbulb which suggests I need to remove the name parameter... that's not wrong code, but in this case it's a wrong suggestion based on what you're describing above.
So to me it's not ugly, it's bad behavior.
Submit a request to tracker.
Friendly, Dmitry
-- Dmitry Lomov IntelliJ Labs / JetBrains Inc. http://www.intellij.com "Develop with pleasure!"
I definitely do agree!
Michael Seele wrote:
So? I like the functionality. I am sure they'll get the icon right soon
enough.
"Guillaume Pothier" <gpothier@free.fr> wrote in message
news:bev13p$bvi$2@is.intellij.net...
>
>
>
I mean, I also like the functionality, and liked better the yellow icon that
was serving the same purpose since Ariadna...
Amnon I. Govrin wrote:
>> I definitely do agree!
>>
>> Michael Seele wrote:
>>
>> >
>>
once JetBrain's icon painters get going, they are hard to stop. It has always been that way. And once in a while they are hit by the irresistible urge to renovate some icons..
Just to start a flame war:
I like it! :o)
If you have not noticed, there are now TWO lightbulbs - one is yellow
(meaning: IDEA has some functionality available at caret, as in "If you
fancy to split this declaration into declaration and assignment, I can do
it for you"), and the other is red with excl mark in it (meaning: "you have
a problem in your code, but I have an idea how to fix it").
Which of the two icons is ugly? Or both?
Friendly,
Dmitry
Guillaume Pothier wrote:
>> So? I like the functionality. I am sure they'll get the icon right soon
>> enough.
>>
>> "Guillaume Pothier" <gpothier@free.fr> wrote in message
>> news:bev13p$bvi$2@is.intellij.net...
>>> I definitely do agree!
>>>
>>> Michael Seele wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>>
--
Dmitry Lomov
IntelliJ Labs / JetBrains Inc.
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
OK, and what's wrong with that? :)
"Christian Sell" <christian.sell@netcologne.de> wrote in message
news:13631582.1058255870640.JavaMail.itn@is.intellij.net...
always been that way. And once in a while they are hit by the irresistible
urge to renovate some icons..
Stefan Freyr Stefansson wrote:
I like them too. What's wrong with them?
/kesh
Dmitry Lomov wrote:
Actually this is not quite right Dmitry because after I added a method
and had something like:
public static void setUserName(String name){...}
and I place the carret at name, I get a red lightbulb which suggests I
need to remove the name parameter... that's not wrong code, but in this
case it's a wrong suggestion based on what you're describing above.
So to me it's not ugly, it's bad behavior.
R
>>I mean, I also like the functionality, and liked better the yellow icon
>>that was serving the same purpose since Ariadna...
>>
>>
>>Amnon I. Govrin wrote:
>>
>>
>>>So? I like the functionality. I am sure they'll get the icon right soon
>>>enough.
>>>
>>>"Guillaume Pothier" <gpothier@free.fr> wrote in message
>>>news:bev13p$bvi$2@is.intellij.net...
>>>
>>>>I definitely do agree!
>>>>
>>>>Michael Seele wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
Dmitry Lomov wrote:
Actually this is not quite right Dmitry because after I added a method
and had something like:
public static void setUserName(String name){...}
and I place the carret at name, I get a red lightbulb which suggests I
need to remove the name parameter... that's not wrong code, but in this
case it's a wrong suggestion based on what you're describing above.
So to me it's not ugly, it's bad behavior.
R
>>I mean, I also like the functionality, and liked better the yellow icon
>>that was serving the same purpose since Ariadna...
>>
>>
>>Amnon I. Govrin wrote:
>>
>>
>>>So? I like the functionality. I am sure they'll get the icon right soon
>>>enough.
>>>
>>>"Guillaume Pothier" <gpothier@free.fr> wrote in message
>>>news:bev13p$bvi$2@is.intellij.net...
>>>
>>>>I definitely do agree!
>>>>
>>>>Michael Seele wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
Actually this is not quite right Dmitry because after I added a method
and had something like:
public static void setUserName(String name){...}
and I place the carret at name, I get a red lightbulb which suggests I
need to remove the name parameter... that's not wrong code, but in this
case it's a wrong suggestion based on what you're describing above.
So to me it's not ugly, it's bad behavior.
Dmitry Lomov wrote:
>>I mean, I also like the functionality, and liked better the yellow icon
>>that was serving the same purpose since Ariadna...
>>
>>
>>Amnon I. Govrin wrote:
>>
>>
>>>So? I like the functionality. I am sure they'll get the icon right soon
>>>enough.
>>>
>>>"Guillaume Pothier" <gpothier@free.fr> wrote in message
>>>news:bev13p$bvi$2@is.intellij.net...
>>>
>>>>I definitely do agree!
>>>>
>>>>Michael Seele wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
Sorry about the spam my mail server was giving me a hard time and didn't
see the emails fly out.
R
Robert S. Sfeir wrote:
>> If you have not noticed, there are now TWO lightbulbs - one is yellow
>> (meaning: IDEA has some functionality available at caret, as in "If you
>> fancy to split this declaration into declaration and assignment, I can do
>> it for you"), and the other is red with excl mark in it (meaning: "you
>> have
>> a problem in your code, but I have an idea how to fix it").
>>
>> Which of the two icons is ugly? Or both?
>>
>> Friendly,
>> Dmitry
>>
>> Guillaume Pothier wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I mean, I also like the functionality, and liked better the yellow icon
>>> that was serving the same purpose since Ariadna...
>>>
>>>
>>> Amnon I. Govrin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> So? I like the functionality. I am sure they'll get the icon right soon
>>>> enough.
>>>>
>>>> "Guillaume Pothier" <gpothier@free.fr> wrote in message
>>>> news:bev13p$bvi$2@is.intellij.net...
>>>>
>>>>> I definitely do agree!
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael Seele wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
Robert S. Sfeir wrote:
Submit a request to tracker.
Friendly,
Dmitry
--
Dmitry Lomov
IntelliJ Labs / JetBrains Inc.
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"