What are your open Aurora stopship bugs

Aurora release is coming soon, and I know there are some bugs that I'm getting very nervous about that aren't fixed yet, and look like they might not be fixed for 4.0 release.

I was wondering what bugs everyone will be angry about if they aren't fixed for 4.0. Here are mine:

"Dump Threads" closes all open applications on desktop
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=18945

Cannot start IDEA after installing plugin
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=22963

This next one doesn't bother me so much, but:
Dialogs show up without focus on Linux
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=24882
-and-
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=16183

20 comments
Comment actions Permalink

Keith, I presume you use Linux...

Those are pretty much my "P1" bugs right now.

Keith Lea wrote:

"Dump Threads" closes all open applications on desktop
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=18945

This actually kills KDE on my machine!


Cannot start IDEA after installing plugin
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=22963

Do you use 2.6 kernel? I notice this issue was closed but this is most
definitely still an issue with the 2.6 kernel. There are other bugs
open on this.


This next one doesn't bother me so much, but:
Dialogs show up without focus on Linux
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=24882
-and-
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=16183

I see both of these.

Nick.

0
Comment actions Permalink

Keith, I presume you use Linux...


Yeah.

Cannot start IDEA after installing plugin


Do you use 2.6 kernel? I notice this issue was
closed but this is most
definitely still an issue with the 2.6 kernel.
There are other bugs
open on this.


This isn't that bug, actually, this is a problem with systemwide IDEA installations where the users don't have write access to the plugins folder.

It wouldn't be a problem if there were two plugin paths, one in ~/.IntelliJIDEA, as well as the current system plugin path. I requested something like this in http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=22055, and a similar request exists at http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=16177.

0
Comment actions Permalink

http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=26413

a new tracker ID, but a bug that keeps popping up and getting fixed. maybe it's hard to have a regression test for??!?

0
Comment actions Permalink

seems to be fixed in 1101. just hope it doesn't come back.

0
Comment actions Permalink

http://www.intellij.net/tracker/viewSCR?threadId=65680

They know about it though, and I was told they would look into it to
improve it.

No other major issues that can't wait until after 4.0

R

0
Comment actions Permalink

On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:07:53 +0000, Keith Lea wrote:

This isn't that bug, actually, this is a problem with systemwide IDEA
installations where the users don't have write access to the plugins
folder.


I solved this in my RPM installation by making the ./plugins directory
read-write, I'll be patching my .spec to call IDEA with the appropirate
params to change the plugin directory based on logged in user, which will
negate that requirement.

--
Discouragement is a dissatisfaction with the past, a distaste for the
present, and a distrust of the future - Maree De Jong, CLCA.

0
Comment actions Permalink

I think making any system directory read-write is a bad idea, and I think it's definitely not a solution for multi-user IDEA installations. What if one user wants to disable a plugin, etc.?

0
Comment actions Permalink

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 02:48:04 +0000, Keith Lea wrote:

I think making any system directory read-write is a bad idea, and I think
it's definitely not a solution for multi-user IDEA installations. What if
one user wants to disable a plugin, etc.?


Thats why I'm going to look at setting the plugin dir on startup.
Currently, all the linux machines I'm using IDEA on are used by me only,
so its not so much a problem. If I start to publicly share the RPMS
however...


--
Discouragement is a dissatisfaction with the past, a distaste for the
present, and a distrust of the future - Maree De Jong, CLCA.

0
Comment actions Permalink

The hang with 100% percent cpu after a paste in the editor:
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=26057

0
Comment actions Permalink

This one is killing me:
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=26547
IntelliJ crashes EVERY time I compile anything.

Also the web.xml not saving is killing me
http://www.intellij.net/forums/thread.jsp?forum=4&thread=67299&tstart=0&trange=50

These are the two most problematic bugs for me and I have been having both
since build ~1020

--Grant


"Keith Lea" <keith@cs.oswego.edu> wrote in message
news:19273637.1074108252421.JavaMail.itn@is.intellij.net...

Aurora release is coming soon, and I know there are some bugs that I'm

getting very nervous about that aren't fixed yet, and look like they might
not be fixed for 4.0 release.
>

I was wondering what bugs everyone will be angry about if they aren't

fixed for 4.0. Here are mine:
>

"Dump Threads" closes all open applications on desktop
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=18945

>

Cannot start IDEA after installing plugin
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=22963

>

This next one doesn't bother me so much, but:
Dialogs show up without focus on Linux
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=24882
-and-
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=16183



0
Comment actions Permalink

On 2004/01/15 11:34, Bas Leijdekkers wrote:

The hang with 100% percent cpu after a paste in the editor:
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=26057


Oh, almost forgot, the Run window not showing all output:
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=25474

0
Comment actions Permalink

Now the first bug on my list has been marked Stopship for Aurora (thanks Valentin Kipiatkov) and the second has been fixed (thanks Stanislav Davydov)!

0
Comment actions Permalink

Also the web.xml not saving is killing me

>
http://www.intellij.net/forums/thread.jsp?forum=4&thread=67299&tstart=0&trange=50

Is there any tracker request for this?

--
Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"


"Grant Gochnauer" <grant@gochnauer.org> wrote in message
news:bu66an$prd$1@is.intellij.net...

This one is killing me:
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=26547
IntelliJ crashes EVERY time I compile anything.

>

Also the web.xml not saving is killing me

>
http://www.intellij.net/forums/thread.jsp?forum=4&thread=67299&tstart=0&trange=50
>

These are the two most problematic bugs for me and I have been having both
since build ~1020

>

--Grant

>
>

"Keith Lea" <keith@cs.oswego.edu> wrote in message
news:19273637.1074108252421.JavaMail.itn@is.intellij.net...

Aurora release is coming soon, and I know there are some bugs that I'm

getting very nervous about that aren't fixed yet, and look like they might
not be fixed for 4.0 release.
>

I was wondering what bugs everyone will be angry about if they aren't

fixed for 4.0. Here are mine:
>

"Dump Threads" closes all open applications on desktop
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=18945

>

Cannot start IDEA after installing plugin
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=22963

>

This next one doesn't bother me so much, but:
Dialogs show up without focus on Linux
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=24882
-and-
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=16183

>
>


0
Comment actions Permalink

Export module libraries to dependent modules:

>

http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=21410


We decided to support this in IDEA 4.1 (released shortly after Aurora) since
it's too late to include this into Aurora.

--
Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"


"Alexander Kitaev" <no_mail@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:32497489.1074182055997.JavaMail.itn@is.intellij.net...

Export module libraries to dependent modules:

>

http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=21410



0
Comment actions Permalink

Agreed. This is very nearly top on my list. A dup of the this issue is
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=19263.
Unfortunatley, it seems that jetbrains is not convinced that this is a
cleaner model than the three library types.

Alexander Kitaev wrote:

Export module libraries to dependent modules:

http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=21410


0
Comment actions Permalink

Whoops, seems that Valentin said just a few messages ago that is
scheduled for 4.1. Excellent news.

Barry Kaplan wrote:

Agreed. This is very nearly top on my list. A dup of the this issue is
http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=19263.
Unfortunatley, it seems that jetbrains is not convinced that this is a
cleaner model than the three library types.

Alexander Kitaev wrote:

>> Export module libraries to dependent modules:
>>
>> http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=21410



0
Comment actions Permalink

I had the same problems, and they both went away when I created my project and module from scratch.

0
Comment actions Permalink

In article <19273637.1074108252421.JavaMail.itn@is.intellij.net>,
Keith Lea <keith@cs.oswego.edu> wrote:

Aurora release is coming soon, and I know there are some bugs that I'm
getting very nervous about that aren't fixed yet, and look like they might
not be fixed for 4.0 release.

>

<http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=13389>

I have a lot of projects using local cvs. I tried setting up ssh, as a
(bad) security compromise, but had problems in 1089, such as it asking
for a private key file, rather than just demanding a password a la all
my other ssh-based cvs installs.

(I am aware that local cvs really, really sucks in a security conscious
environment, but using it IMPROVES my security here. With ssh, I have
to have that port open, which I do not if I can reflect against the
filesystem.)

Scott

0
Comment actions Permalink

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:35:02 -0800, Scott Ellsworth wrote:

I have a lot of projects using local cvs. I tried setting up ssh, as a
(bad) security compromise, but had problems in 1089, such as it asking
for a private key file, rather than just demanding a password a la all
my other ssh-based cvs installs.


IMHO key-based authentication is the more flexible option (if somewhat
more complex to set up initially), but I agree the lack of support for
password authentication is puzzling.

(I am aware that local cvs really, really sucks in a security conscious
environment, but using it IMPROVES my security here. With ssh, I have
to have that port open, which I do not if I can reflect against the
filesystem.)


Can't you configure your ssh daemon to bind only to the loopback
interface? That would permit only connections from `localhost'. I don't
see why IDEA shouldn't be happy with `localhost' or `127.0.0.1' as the CVS
server hostname.

--
Mark Scott

0

Please sign in to leave a comment.