396 Bug fixes!

I did a search for bugs fixed after 977. A very impressive 396!

Are you waiting for an even 400 for the next release?

Keep up the good work!

16 comments

On the other hand, there are 935 submitted bug reports on
build 977 and higher that have not been fixed.

This means that bugs are being reported faster than they
are being fixed. :)

0

BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I think they've been wanting to hand it to us, but they had an issue
with CVS or LVCS or something which was major

Dick Lieber wrote:

| I did a search for bugs fixed after 977. A very impressive 396!
|
| Are you waiting for an even 400 for the next release?
|
| Keep up the good work!
-


BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/zMM/+cV9vuB27SARAvmtAJ4nuIzFOkC2eSqw3SlA/K9yWp8uugCdFzEh
KaEtJ06k+vFF0sSQzMY563s=
=SUql
-


END PGP SIGNATURE-----

0

BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Make that 410... I wonder if the next EAP is going to be the code freeze
release!

R

Dick Lieber wrote:
| I did a search for bugs fixed after 977. A very impressive 396!
|
| Are you waiting for an even 400 for the next release?
|
| Keep up the good work!
-


BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/zR2OcV9vuB27SARAuuEAKCb9xGW4CDj1d2jwG0lei5UcMgQwCeMEXR
DvPUXiupLqVqOnkk6kHbbU0=
=C9z9
-


END PGP SIGNATURE-----

0

Robert S. Sfeir <robert@codepuccino.com> wrote:

Make that 410... I wonder if the next EAP is going to be the code freeze
release!


I don't think that we're there yet. GUI still is under construction. If
I were them I'd like to get more feedback on the changes that they make
right now. Also, they promised better Mac support. I guess they'd like
to hear about that, too (but I guess that would be considered to be a
bug fix).

The only real show stopper is that k_b_ assertion failed thingy that
pops up frequently.

Dirk Dittert

0

The "k_b_ " assertion seems to be fixed already (deliberately tested on Mac)

--

Best regards,
Eugene Zhuravlev
JetBrains, Inc, http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"


"Dirk Dittert" <dittert@despammed.com> wrote in message news:1g5d8de.1sroqbp1qng6upN%dittert@despammed.com...

Robert S. Sfeir <robert@codepuccino.com> wrote:

>

Make that 410... I wonder if the next EAP is going to be the code freeze
release!

>

I don't think that we're there yet. GUI still is under construction. If
I were them I'd like to get more feedback on the changes that they make
right now. Also, they promised better Mac support. I guess they'd like
to hear about that, too (but I guess that would be considered to be a
bug fix).

>

The only real show stopper is that k_b_ assertion failed thingy that
pops up frequently.

>

Dirk Dittert



0

Eugene Zhuravlev (JetBrains) <jeka@intellij.com> wrote:

The "k_b_ " assertion seems to be fixed already (deliberately tested on Mac)


Thank you for pointing that out. I already saw that in the tracker. Now
I am eagerly waiting for that build, but hey, that's the way how EAP
works ;)

Dirk Dittert

0

yes, but it doesn't help us when you fix it and don't provide a new build! how long must we wait till the next build will be released? thanks!!!

0

Hi,

yes I really need a new build :-/

0

I need a fix man, give me some of the good stuff. I will pay anything, just
give me my fix. ;)


"Ralf Kraus" <no_mail@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:22299650.1070459152561.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost...

Hi,

>

yes I really need a new build :-/



0

We are very sorry about such a long delay, but we also cannot afford publishing the build that does not work properly at least for
us...

--

Best regards,
Eugene Zhuravlev
JetBrains, Inc, http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

"Dirk Dittert" <dittert@despammed.com> wrote in message news:1g5e43m.oo68g81rbqgsnN%dittert@despammed.com...

Eugene Zhuravlev (JetBrains) <jeka@intellij.com> wrote:

>

The "k_b_ " assertion seems to be fixed already (deliberately tested on Mac)

>

Thank you for pointing that out. I already saw that in the tracker. Now
I am eagerly waiting for that build, but hey, that's the way how EAP
works ;)

>

Dirk Dittert



0

Well, a short weekly-progress-notice would have kept the masses calm.

Tom

0

Does this mean we get to eat soon? :)

R

Thomas Singer wrote:

Well, a short weekly-progress-notice would have kept the masses calm.

Tom

0

Thomas Singer wrote:

Well, a short weekly-progress-notice would have kept the masses calm.


Thomas,
are you from the West, or from the East Germany?

:)

Friendly,
Dmitry
--
Dmitry Lomov
IntelliJ Labs / JetBrains Inc.
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

0

Uh oh... loaded question.... careful where you step ;)

Dmitry Lomov (JetBrains) wrote:

Thomas Singer wrote:

>>Well, a short weekly-progress-notice would have kept the masses calm.


Thomas,
are you from the West, or from the East Germany?

:)

Friendly,
Dmitry

0

Eugene Zhuravlev (JetBrains) <jeka@intellij.com> wrote:

We are very sorry about such a long delay, but we also cannot afford
publishing the build that does not work properly at least for us...


That's alright with me. I think that this is what we signed up for. We
knew that the IDE is under development when we signed up for EAP. If the
EAP build doesn't work for me, I can always fire up 3.0.5. Additionally,
it is preferrable to have a stable build than just the next build
available.

But maybe you should think about adding the help back in as soon as the
UI has settled a little bit. That'll give us some time to suggest
improvemnts before the final pre-release rush starts.

Keep up the good work!

Dirk Dittert

0

We are very sorry about such a long delay, but we also cannot
afford publishing the build that does not work properly at least
for us...


That's OK. You job is to continue to produce the best IDE made, and ours is to eagerly anticipate the next EAP release. 8^)

0

Please sign in to leave a comment.