Build 977 and Apple's JDK 1.4 Follow
On my G5 they don't seem to play nice. I cleaned up my cache and created new project and made my target JDK to be 1.4.. and it croaks while loading the classes (allways at this class: sun/corba/se/internal/iiop/CDROutputStream_1_0.class).
Switched to JDK 1.3 and seems to work fine. Any OS X people having same issue? BTW, I never installed the quicktime java update so never had any issues with the JDK.
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Works fine for me here on dual G5.
g5:~ steven$ java -version
java version "1.4.1_01"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.1_01-99)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.1_01-27, mixed mode)
In fact I have to add, performance is excellent. Now if I could just stop those annoying logger error popups whenever I build my project...
(java.lang.Throwable at com.intellij.openapi.diagnostic.Logger.assertTrue(Logger.java:6) )
In article <21267932.1069734847810.JavaMail.email@example.com>,
Aye Thu <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
I have had lots of problems, and since they started, 963 doesn't seem to
work so well either. There have been a few threads about Mac OS X issues
recently; check the archives if you want to see more.
JetBrains bought a new G5 recently, so hopefully they'll have it fixed
A question for the G5 owners (not related to IntelliJ)...
Can you create a Java VM that uses more than 2 GB of RAM?
For example, can you set the mx parameter:
java -Xmx3000M com.company.SomeClass
On 32-bit wintel we are limited to around 1500M as the max. I was just wondering if the latest Mac OS and the G5 hardware broke that barrier.
doesn't look like it:
Error occurred during initialization of VM
Could not reserve enough space for object heap
This is on a dual G5 2gHz w/ 2gig of physical ram. Best I could do was -Xmx1956M. Maybe virtual memory doesn't help here. dunno.
1956M is better than I can get on Windows or Linux.
It might be that the Java VM is still limited to a 2 GB heap limit. That's a shame because the OS/hardware combo is supposed to support more.
Thanks for trying.
In article <ehanson-lists-8ED022.email@example.com>,
Erik Hanson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
The bug is now marked as "fixed". I can't wait for the next EAP
We have some serious problems in version control support. We'll release new
build as soon as they get resolved.
"Develop with pleasure!"
I'm not sure but I think that the VM wants the memory in one continuous block which 'creates' the limit if the operating system cannot provide that.
On 11/30/03 3:35 AM, in article
As far as I know memory mapped files are implemented using general swapping
scheme and this is completely different memory VM uses.
"Develop with pleasure!"