Thank You for 977

+1

"Donald F. McLean" <dmclean@stsci.edu> wrote in message
news:bpdo64$2cq$1@is.intellij.net...

I've been waiting, it seems like forever, since the module work was
started for an EAP release that I could configure and that would compile
and run our application.

>

977 is it. It looks good, though I think it would nice to have more
convenient access to the project configuration screen (although once
it's correctly configured I may not need access to it much).

>

Thank you for the great work - I look forward to trying out all of the
new features.

>

Donald

>

+1
"Norris Shelton" <nshelton@appriss.com> wrote in message
news:bpdtob$i9v$1@is.intellij.net...

+1

>

"Donald F. McLean" <dmclean@stsci.edu> wrote in message
news:bpdo64$2cq$1@is.intellij.net...

I've been waiting, it seems like forever, since the module work was
started for an EAP release that I could configure and that would compile
and run our application.

>

977 is it. It looks good, though I think it would nice to have more
convenient access to the project configuration screen (although once
it's correctly configured I may not need access to it much).

>

Thank you for the great work - I look forward to trying out all of the
new features.

>

Donald

>

>
>

+1 (yes, me too)

+1,

But it realy not easy to understand "how it use"...

So, now i keep only that Modules - it for ouw code development, instead of
Libraries - it only for thrird-party libraries.

Luck

"Donald F. McLean" <dmclean@stsci.edu> wrote in message
news:bpdo64$2cq$1@is.intellij.net...

I've been waiting, it seems like forever, since the module work was
started for an EAP release that I could configure and that would compile
and run our application.

>

977 is it. It looks good, though I think it would nice to have more
convenient access to the project configuration screen (although once
it's correctly configured I may not need access to it much).

>

Thank you for the great work - I look forward to trying out all of the
new features.

>

Donald

>