ETA for next build?

Since the unfortunately unability of 939 to load openapi.jar or idea.jar I am quite eager to get my hands on the next build.
Are you making any progress and will we soon see a build?

BTW there hasn't been a progress report news since early July. It would be good to know what is going on and keep in touch with the stabilization plan as it firms up.

Keep up the good work.

Jacques

0
16 comments

Yes, please. Right now, I can't do any open-api development for Aurora.

0

+1 for the weekly reports

regards

Anders

0

Jacques Morel wrote:

Since the unfortunately unability of 939 to load openapi.jar or idea.jar I
am quite eager to get my hands on the next build. Are you making any
progress and will we soon see a build?


Well, I hope so, but at the moment we have not yet resolved the idea.jar
problem...
Jacques, I think you should know better than pressing so hard on IDEA
developers :) Believe me, we are trying very hard to figure things out.

Friendly,
Dmitry

--
Dmitry Lomov
IntelliJ Labs / JetBrains Inc.
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

0

On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:43:40 +0400, Dmitry Lomov (JetBrains) wrote:

Jacques, I think you should know better than pressing so hard on IDEA
developers :) Believe me, we are trying very hard to figure things out.


Why not give us all access to the IDEA cvs server and we can help with the
bugs ;) heh.

Free the source!!! :)

--
"It's all in the heat of the moment, it's all in the pain..." Devy.
Mark Derricutt @ mark@talios.com @ talios.blog-city.com

0

I was thinking in the same line since obviously it only occurs with obfuscated code. I was thinking that you should just not obfuscate your code ;) Sounds like a simple enough way to take care of that and some of the recent refactoring re-rants... ;)

But in the end Dmitry, I have such a beautiful toy I cannot help myself to be the regular Customer here: I want it last week w/o bugs w/ all my features (especially my refactorings ;) for a symbolic $1 and I won't let anybody else play with it!!!!!!!

Anyway I am not losing sleep over my post... I know that whatever we say it won't change the already very fast pace that you guys develop at. So I am not presuring you to deliver faster. I am pressuring you to give us more information ;)

Jacques

0

Mark Derricutt wrote:

On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:43:40 +0400, Dmitry Lomov (JetBrains) wrote:

>> Jacques, I think you should know better than pressing so hard on IDEA
>> developers :) Believe me, we are trying very hard to figure things out.


Why not give us all access to the IDEA cvs server and we can help with the
bugs ;) heh.


Will you help with the fixes afterwards? :)

Cheers,
Dmitry
--
Dmitry Lomov
IntelliJ Labs / JetBrains Inc.
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

0

The idea.jar problem have been resolved, and we hope to release the next
build tomorrow morning.

If you are interested the problem was in the obfuscator we are using
corrupting class files with generics. Class file parsing have been made
more robust to handle this.

Friendly,
Dmitry


Jacques Morel wrote:

Since the unfortunately unability of 939 to load openapi.jar or idea.jar I
am quite eager to get my hands on the next build. Are you making any
progress and will we soon see a build?

BTW there hasn't been a progress report news since early July. It would be
good to know what is going on and keep in touch with the stabilization
plan as it firms up.

Keep up the good work.

Jacques


--
Dmitry Lomov
IntelliJ Labs / JetBrains Inc.
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

0

Great job. Must have been a tough one!

Looking forward to using the next build (no pressure Dmitry... Just a fact ;)

Jacques

0

Dmitry Lomov (JetBrains) wrote:
> If you are interested

of course..

> the problem was in the obfuscator we are using
> corrupting class files with generics.

Was the obfuscator the problem (a bug in it), or the way you had
configured it?


I'm just curious (not blaming anybody).

Alain

0

BTW was it a KlassMaster bug then? Do they work with generics compiled code or do you have to post-process bycode yourself before KLM?

Just curious

Jacques

0

Jacques Morel wrote:

BTW was it a KlassMaster bug then? Do they work with generics compiled
code or do you have to post-process bycode yourself before KLM?


We had to adapt out class parser. ZKM's bug only corrupts the additonal
information about generics, which is not used by JVM.

Friendly,
Dmitry
--
Dmitry Lomov
IntelliJ Labs / JetBrains Inc.
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

0

Alain Ravet wrote:

Dmitry Lomov (JetBrains) wrote:
> If you are interested

of course..

> the problem was in the obfuscator we are using
> corrupting class files with generics.

Was the obfuscator the problem (a bug in it), or the way you had
configured it?


It was (or rather is) a bug in the obfuscator.
BTW it is not critical to program execution.

Friendly,
Dmitry
--
Dmitry Lomov
IntelliJ Labs / JetBrains Inc.
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

0

On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 19:57:41 +0400, Dmitry Lomov (JetBrains) wrote:

Will you help with the fixes afterwards? :)


Will I get a free license? ;)

--
"It's all in the heat of the moment, it's all in the pain..." Devy.
Mark Derricutt @ mark@talios.com @ talios.blog-city.com

0

Dmitry,

could you please bundle with this release configuration checkbox to turn off
smooth scrolling.
Many of us are not used to use this and would like to see a way to turn it
off.


Uzytkownik "Dmitry Lomov (JetBrains)" <Dmitry.Lomov@jetbrains.com> napisal w
wiadomosci news:blca34$91r$4@is.intellij.net...

The idea.jar problem have been resolved, and we hope to release the next
build tomorrow morning.

>

If you are interested the problem was in the obfuscator we are using
corrupting class files with generics. Class file parsing have been made
more robust to handle this.

>

Friendly,
Dmitry

>
>

Jacques Morel wrote:

>

Since the unfortunately unability of 939 to load openapi.jar or idea.jar

I

am quite eager to get my hands on the next build. Are you making any
progress and will we soon see a build?

>

BTW there hasn't been a progress report news since early July. It would

be

good to know what is going on and keep in touch with the stabilization
plan as it firms up.

>

Keep up the good work.

>

Jacques

>

--
Dmitry Lomov
IntelliJ Labs / JetBrains Inc.
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"



0

Michal Szklanowski wrote:

Dmitry,

could you please bundle with this release configuration checkbox to turn
off smooth scrolling.
Many of us are not used to use this and would like to see a way to turn it
off.


Apparently this is a thread-hijacking, which is a serious offence to
the netiquette ;)

Friendly,
Dmitry


Uzytkownik "Dmitry Lomov (JetBrains)" <Dmitry.Lomov@jetbrains.com> napisal
w wiadomosci news:blca34$91r$4@is.intellij.net...

>> The idea.jar problem have been resolved, and we hope to release the next
>> build tomorrow morning.
>>
>> If you are interested the problem was in the obfuscator we are using
>> corrupting class files with generics. Class file parsing have been made
>> more robust to handle this.
>>
>> Friendly,
>> Dmitry
>>
>>
>> Jacques Morel wrote:
>>
>> > Since the unfortunately unability of 939 to load openapi.jar or
>> > idea.jar

I

>> > am quite eager to get my hands on the next build. Are you making any
>> > progress and will we soon see a build?
>> >
>> > BTW there hasn't been a progress report news since early July. It would

be

>> > good to know what is going on and keep in touch with the stabilization
>> > plan as it firms up.
>> >
>> > Keep up the good work.
>> >
>> > Jacques
>>
>> --
>> Dmitry Lomov
>> IntelliJ Labs / JetBrains Inc.
>> http://www.intellij.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"

--
Dmitry Lomov
IntelliJ Labs / JetBrains Inc.
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

0

NO! Don't waste any more time on that feature, please!

Tom

0

Please sign in to leave a comment.