Next EAP?

Seeing all the bugfixes in 834, 835, ... 842, is there a realisitic
chance for us to see a public EAP build in the very near future
(sorry, the latest builds were too unstable for me to be used in
serious development)?

Tom

20 comments
Comment actions Permalink

Thomas Singer wrote:

Seeing all the bugfixes in 834, 835, ... 842, is there a realisitic
chance for us to see a public EAP build in the very near future
(sorry, the latest builds were too unstable for me to be used in
serious development)?

Tom


Perhaps this evening we will build 842.

Regards,
Vladimir Kondratyev
_____________________
JetBrains

0
Comment actions Permalink

Don't feel you need to do a build just because we're asking for one. I'd
rather wait a little while to have a more stable build, than have one put out
sooner.

Thanks for all the great work, btw!

;ted

"Vladimir Kondratyev" <vova@intellij.net> wrote in message
news:bdpmhe$9ba$1@is.intellij.net...

Thomas Singer wrote:

Seeing all the bugfixes in 834, 835, ... 842, is there a realisitic
chance for us to see a public EAP build in the very near future
(sorry, the latest builds were too unstable for me to be used in
serious development)?

>

Tom

>

Perhaps this evening we will build 842.

>

Regards,
Vladimir Kondratyev
_____________________
JetBrains

>


0
Comment actions Permalink

On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:47:34 -0700, Ted Young wrote:

Don't feel you need to do a build just because we're asking for one. I'd
rather wait a little while to have a more stable build, than have one put
out sooner.


What are people finding unstable? I've had IDEA crash in ages, it did
need to kill -9 it earlier today when it came unresponsive, but then the
rest of the machine had gone lala as well for some reason...

--
...turn to the light - don't be frightened by the shadows it creates,
...turn to the light - turning away could be a terrible mistake
...dream theater - the great debate


0
Comment actions Permalink

Yeah, I've been stable for a while. Anybody know the status of the EJB/webapp stuff? jetbrains warned it was broken several builds ago. Should we go back to testing that yet?

0
Comment actions Permalink

Hello,

Just for my interest, how JetBrains determine then new build is stable?

Thanks!
--
Alexey Efimov, Software Engineer
Sputnik Labs,
http://www.spklabs.com
"Vladimir Kondratyev" <vova@intellij.net> wrote in message
news:bdpmhe$9ba$1@is.intellij.net...

Thomas Singer wrote:

Seeing all the bugfixes in 834, 835, ... 842, is there a realisitic
chance for us to see a public EAP build in the very near future
(sorry, the latest builds were too unstable for me to be used in
serious development)?

>

Tom

>

Perhaps this evening we will build 842.

>

Regards,
Vladimir Kondratyev
_____________________
JetBrains

>


0
Comment actions Permalink

The build is considered to be stable, if <50% of tests failed.




...Joking...

--
Best regards,
Mike Aizatsky.
-


JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"



0
Comment actions Permalink


"Mike Aizatsky" <mike@intellij.com> a ?crit dans le message de
news:bds6qt$h11$1@is.intellij.net...

The build is considered to be stable, if <50% of tests failed.


It might have been < 99 % !!!! ;)
No, honestly, those EAP builds are of quite good quality.
In fact, I use it for production every day, all day long !
Some rare times, I have to skip a build when there's some bad internal
error, but otherwise, it's okay, keep up the good work Thanks !

Guillaume


0
Comment actions Permalink

I'll frame this :)))
And will show it to my boss, then his will ask me "what is a red in test
results?" :))

--
Alexey Efimov, Software Engineer
Sputnik Labs,
http://www.spklabs.com
"Mike Aizatsky" <mike@intellij.com> wrote in message
news:bds6qt$h11$1@is.intellij.net...

The build is considered to be stable, if <50% of tests failed.

>
>
>
>

...Joking...

>

--
Best regards,
Mike Aizatsky.
------------------------------
JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>
>


0
Comment actions Permalink

I'm getting lots of NPEs at the PsiElementWrapper.findLeavesAt(). However, to
be fair, I'm not sure whether it's due to the plugins that I have installed.

;ted

2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue -
Error during dispatching of
java.awt.event.InvocationEvent[INVOCATION_DEFAULT,runnable=com.intellij.codeIns
ight.d.a.co@1a0eece,notifier=null,catchExceptions=false,when=1057076980030] on
sun.awt.windows.WToolkit@bd7723
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue -
IntelliJ IDEA (Aurora) Build #833
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue -
JDK: 1.4.1_02
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue -
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue -
Vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue -
OS: Windows 2000
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue -
Last Action: CloseEditor
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue -
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.intellij.psi.PsiElementWrapper.findLeavesAt(PsiElementWrapper.java:27)
at
org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.Intention.findAcceptedLeaf(Intention.java:64
)
at org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.Intention.isAvailable(Intention.java:54)
at org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.Intention.isAvailable(Intention.java:39)
at
org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.AuroraIntentionAction.isAvailable(AuroraInte
ntionAction.java:25)
at com.intellij.codeInsight.d.a.cf.c(cf.java:57)
at com.intellij.codeInsight.d.a.cf.b(cf.java:76)
at com.intellij.codeInsight.d.a.co.run(co.java:1)
at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
at com.intellij.ide.t.a(t.java:78)
at com.intellij.ide.t.dispatchEvent(t.java:30)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForHierarchy(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(Unknown Source)
"Alexey Efimov" <aefimov@spklabs.com> wrote in message
news:bds8og$n33$1@is.intellij.net...

I'll frame this :)))
And will show it to my boss, then his will ask me "what is a red in test
results?" :))

>

--
Alexey Efimov, Software Engineer
Sputnik Labs,
http://www.spklabs.com
"Mike Aizatsky" <mike@intellij.com> wrote in message
news:bds6qt$h11$1@is.intellij.net...

The build is considered to be stable, if <50% of tests failed.

>
>
>
>

...Joking...

>

--
Best regards,
Mike Aizatsky.
------------------------------
JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>
>

>
>


0
Comment actions Permalink

org.intellij.* is a clear indication that exception comes from a plugin.
Idea uses only com.intellij.* classes.

Friendly,
Dmitry

Ted Young wrote:

I'm getting lots of NPEs at the PsiElementWrapper.findLeavesAt().
However, to be fair, I'm not sure whether it's due to the plugins that I
have installed.

;ted

2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue
- Error during dispatching of

java.awt.event.InvocationEvent[INVOCATION_DEFAULT,runnable=com.intellij.codeIns

ight.d.a.co@1a0eece,notifier=null,catchExceptions=false,when=1057076980030]

on sun.awt.windows.WToolkit@bd7723
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue
-
IntelliJ IDEA (Aurora) Build #833
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue
- JDK: 1.4.1_02
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue
- VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue
- Vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue
- OS: Windows 2000
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue
- Last Action: CloseEditor
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue
- java.lang.NullPointerException
at

org.intellij.psi.PsiElementWrapper.findLeavesAt(PsiElementWrapper.java:27)

at

org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.Intention.findAcceptedLeaf(Intention.java:64

)
at

org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.Intention.isAvailable(Intention.java:54)

at

org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.Intention.isAvailable(Intention.java:39)

at

org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.AuroraIntentionAction.isAvailable(AuroraInte

ntionAction.java:25)
at com.intellij.codeInsight.d.a.cf.c(cf.java:57)
at com.intellij.codeInsight.d.a.cf.b(cf.java:76)
at com.intellij.codeInsight.d.a.co.run(co.java:1)
at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
at com.intellij.ide.t.a(t.java:78)
at com.intellij.ide.t.dispatchEvent(t.java:30)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForHierarchy(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(Unknown Source)
"Alexey Efimov" <aefimov@spklabs.com> wrote in message
news:bds8og$n33$1@is.intellij.net...

>> I'll frame this :)))
>> And will show it to my boss, then his will ask me "what is a red in test
>> results?" :))
>>
>> --
>> Alexey Efimov, Software Engineer
>> Sputnik Labs,
>> http://www.spklabs.com
>> "Mike Aizatsky" <mike@intellij.com> wrote in message
>> news:bds6qt$h11$1@is.intellij.net...
>> > The build is considered to be stable, if <50% of tests failed.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ...Joking...
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best regards,
>> > Mike Aizatsky.
>> > -


>> > JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software
>> > http://www.intellij.com
>> > "Develop with pleasure!"
>> >
>> >
>>
>>

--
Dmitry Lomov
IntelliJ Labs / JetBrains Inc.
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

0
Comment actions Permalink

Yes, it's a plugin (IntentionPlugin). I'll upload a new version soon. Actually I had a fix for this for quite some time.


Timur

0
Comment actions Permalink

Thanks!

With so many plugins, it's getting really hard to tell which plugin is causing
the problem...which makes it difficult to report the problem. :(

Thanks for the quick fix!

;ted

"Timur Zambalayev" <no_mail@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:26733444.1057082856318.JavaMail.itn@is.intellij.net...

Done. Here's the download link:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=80426&release_id=168933



0
Comment actions Permalink

hopefully the guys start as soon as possible with the new plugin-integration!

0
Comment actions Permalink

why haven't you released 842?

0
Comment actions Permalink

On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 09:37:44 -0700, Ted Young wrote:

I'm getting lots of NPEs at the PsiElementWrapper.findLeavesAt().
However, to be fair, I'm not sure whether it's due to the plugins that I
have installed.


Also - the Psi stuff isn't officially an Open API yet is it?

--
...turn to the light - don't be frightened by the shadows it creates,
...turn to the light - turning away could be a terrible mistake
...dream theater - the great debate


0
Comment actions Permalink

Maybe because >= 50% of the tests failed ;)

Tom

0
Comment actions Permalink

Also - the Psi stuff isn't officially an Open API yet
is it?


There were no changes in the status of PSI API. It's not part of the officially released/published Open API.

0
Comment actions Permalink

I guess it for JDK 1.4.2 issue date thanks...
The fully deep test checking upcomming 704 and 842,

maybe :)))

--
Alexey Efimov, Software Engineer
Sputnik Labs,
http://www.spklabs.com
"Thomas Singer" <thomas.singer@NOregnisSPAM.de> wrote in message
news:om05gvcbue8trcc926bbujonnljjmjm1ep@4ax.com...

Maybe because >= 50% of the tests failed ;)

>

Tom



0
Comment actions Permalink

It's gotta be the Commander's fault. I keep telling them to take it out...
:)

"Thomas Singer" <thomas.singer@NOregnisSPAM.de> wrote in message
news:om05gvcbue8trcc926bbujonnljjmjm1ep@4ax.com...

Maybe because >= 50% of the tests failed ;)

>

Tom



0

Please sign in to leave a comment.