2 comments
Comment actions Permalink

Fixed in #639,
Thank you for report.
--
regards,
Alexey Kudravtsev.
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

PS. Could you please post EJB related messages to the j2ee group ?

"Christopher Cobb" <ccobb@phtek.com> wrote in message
news:3D3EC210.724A9339@phtek.com...

In our project, we may store several beans in the same directory. The
name of our ejb-jar.xml files are therefore:

>

<bean1>-ejb-jar.xml
<bean2>-ejb-jar.xml

>

During our build, we merge these xml files together and all the
associated beans go into a single jar file, with a single 'ejb-jar.xml'
file.

>

However, during development, we keep the *-ejb-jar.xml files for each
bean separate.

>

The dialogue window which prompts for the path to the ejb-jar.xml file
assumes that the file will be named exactly 'ejb-jar.xml'. This is not
the case for our project. The dialog you had in previous versions was
better because it allowed you to select any xml file.

>

I would even allow you to restrict the select to '*ejb-jar.xml'. But
assuming the the file is named exactly 'ejb-jar.xml' makes the current
EJB support unusable for us (unless there is a work-around for the
dialog, which I imagine should be possible by manually editing
configuration files -- but I haven't looked that far yet :).

>

cc

>
>


0
Comment actions Permalink

In <ai5tia$pu3$1@is.intellij.net>, Alexey Kudravtsev wrote:

Fixed in #639,
Thank you for report.


I'd like to add that in 639, the ejb jar file can only be called
ejb-jar.xml. We usually use Foo-ejb-jar.xml but IDEA doesn't recognize
this as a valid descriptor name.

L

--
Laurent Duperval <laurent.duperval@microcell.ca>

How does the guy who drives the snowplow get to work in the mornings?


0

Please sign in to leave a comment.