[invalid] Insert setter proposal

Completed

It should be possible to create "Builder" setters like "withFoo(Type foo)" instead of "setFoo(Type foo)".

Maybe as a changeable default configuration.

When I insert builder setters I always change their name to "with..." and when expecting normal setters I've just stumbled across a problem for the second time: I was wondering why a JSF feature didn't work until I noticed I again inserted a builder instead of a standard setter :)

Edit: Just ignore me since this is already possible via a custom setter template.

0

Please sign in to leave a comment.