IDEA Reference Card
Hi,
I made a reference card for IDEA and uploaded it to www.intellij.org. It
is based on the Default Keystroke Index in the IDEA 3.0 Overview PDF,
with some additions.
I will enhance it, there are still some keys missing and the layout
could be optimized. If anyone has any suggestions, let me know.
To someone from IntelliJ: should I include a copyright or a logo?
http://www.intellij.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/IdeaReferenceCard
Best regards,
rolf
请先登录再写评论。
Rolf,
IMHO it will look much better, if all "+" signs in key shortcuts are
aligned.
--
Best regards,
Mike Aizatsky.
-
JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
Hi Mike,
Do you mean, only the first column of "+" or also the second?
Than it will look somewhat like this, which I think is also a little bit
hard to read, but I will try out how it looks in the card:
Ctrl + Shift + Space
Alt + Insert
Ctrl + Alt + I
Shift + Enter
Ctrl + Shift + J
I also thought of a tighter style with "-" signs, like this:
Ctrl-Shift-J
What do you think?
regards,
rolf
Mike Aizatsky wrote:
>
>
>
>
Rolf,
That might be.
As with aligned "+"s it's hard to tell without looking at it first.
PS Which software are you using for preparing the card?
--
Best regards,
Mike Aizatsky.
-
JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
Rolf:
I think it looks fine... you could always line up the keys in order of their
first buttons to make it visually a litle more appealing (something I didn't
do in the Overview, but I am going to re-do in the coming days)
Alt +
Ctrl +
Ctrl +
Ctrl +
Shift +
Shift +
If you use ' - ' instead of ' + ' -- I don't think it'll look much better,
but you'll have a bit more room.
At anyrate, excellent job.
Best,
David J. Stennett
JetBrains, Inc.
"Develop with Pleasure!"
"Rolf Lohaus" <rolf.lohaus@epost.de> wrote in message
news:aqubkn$afa$1@is.intellij.net...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Mike Aizatsky wrote:
>>Than it will look somewhat like this, which I think is also a little bit
>>hard to read
>>I also thought of a tighter style with "-" signs, like this:
>>Ctrl-Shift-J
>>What do you think?
I will play a little bit with the styles and will see, what looks best.
I use LaTeX and ps2pdf.
regards,
rolf
Hi David,
David J. Stennett wrote:
Yes, I think this should improve the layout, but on the other hand the
current somewhat functional order will be lost.
Thanks!
I added a few missing keystrokes from the Overview, which you might want
add to the Overview:
- Ctrl + F1
- Ctrl + Q
- Alt + Q
- Ctrl + Shift + Backspace
- Ctrl + H
- Ctrl + Shift + H
- Ctrl + Alt + H
- Ctrl + Shift + V
- Shift + Enter
- Ctrl + Enter
- Ctrl + M
- Ctrl + Shift + U
- Ctrl + Alt + F11
- Alt + Right
- Alt + Left
- Ctrl + F4
regards,
rolf
"Rolf Lohaus" <rolf.lohaus@epost.de> wrote in message news:aqubkn$afa$1@is.intellij.net...
>
>
>
Useful one. Just have stuck on the wall.
Thanks
--
Vlad Kamensky,
@Business SPb.
Rolf,
Why don't you share the .tex file too?
--
Best regards,
Mike Aizatsky.
-
JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
Agreed! I would much rather have, for example, the various "find" shortcuts
(Ctrl-F, F3, Alt-F3, etc.) grouped together by function.
Kendall
PS: Rolf, I did notice a inconsistency WRT Alt: Sometimes it's "ALT",
sometimes it's "Alt".
"Rolf Lohaus" <rolf.lohaus@epost.de> wrote in message
news:aqvvlt$vrf$1@is.intellij.net...
>
their
didn't
>
Hi David
you missed Alt + F1: very useful to navigate...
Claude
"Rolf Lohaus" <rolf.lohaus@epost.de> wrote in message
news:aqvvlt$vrf$1@is.intellij.net...
>
>
their
didn't
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Kendall Collett wrote:
Yes, I noticed it already and will correct it in the next version,
thanks. Also there is a double Ctrl + V instead of Ctrl + V and Ctrl +
Shift + V.
regards,
rolf
Hi Claude,
yes I know, there a still some keystrokes missing, like folding, file
structure popup, etc. I hope I will have enough room...
rolf
Claude Leuchter wrote:
Rolf:
Thanks, I'll update the keystrokes...
As for ordering them ... just order them as such for each section, not for
the whole document... that way, each section will retain their unique
keystrokes... they'll just be organized (visually) better in each section.
Best,
David
"Rolf Lohaus" <rolf.lohaus@epost.de> wrote in message
news:aqvvlt$vrf$1@is.intellij.net...
>
>
their
didn't
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
"Rolf Lohaus" <rolf.lohaus@epost.de> skrev i en meddelelse
news:ar0gon$2ku$1@is.intellij.net...
>
>
How about abbreviating? - instead of Ctrl + Alt + N, just write C+A N
Any takers for writing a plugin to generate this automatically? Would be
especially useful after having installed a few plugins with their own key
mappings
Niels
I will share it, when I'm satisfied with it and cleaned it a little bit up.
rolf
Mike Aizatsky wrote:
>
>
>
>
David,
sure not for the whole document. But with sections, do you mean
"Editing", "Debugging", ...? There is also a (probably not perfect)
order within these sections, like the find keystrokes mentioned by
Kendall. And I unwillingly want to mix them.
regards,
rolf
David J. Stennett wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This would be a godsend for people who don't use the default keymapping!
"Niels Ull Harremo?s" <nielsull@adslhome.dk> wrote in message
news:ar0l8r$brf$1@is.intellij.net...
>
>
Little error: Ctrl-V should be Ctrl-Shift-V for paste from previous buffers
Missing: F12 Go back to previous tool window
Jacques
"Rolf Lohaus" <rolf.lohaus@epost.de> wrote in message
news:aqubkn$afa$1@is.intellij.net...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Well, I just have that to say : +1000 !
I took the original ref card, and I corrected it by hand
It would be great (and time saving) to have that generated automatically.
Btw, I have recently submitted a request in order to have "help" and "tips
of the day" using the right shortcuts instead of the default one. It's
painful to look into the doc and see that u dont have the same shortcut !
Guillaume
"Paul Bradshaw" <pbradshaw@vignette.com> a ?crit dans le message de news:
ar1b9t$io9$1@is.intellij.net...
>
key
>
>
Yep, that would be really great and definitely the best solution.
Is it possible to get the actual keymapping with the Open API, I'm not
much into it?
I could generate the LaTeX source, but I think it is not possible for
everyone to process it to get the PDF. A better way would be to use
XSL-FO and FOP to directly produce a high quality PDF.
regards,
rolf
Guillaume Laforge wrote:
>>This would be a godsend for people who don't use the default keymapping
>>
>>"Niels Ull Harremo?s" <nielsull@adslhome.dk> wrote in message
>>news:ar0l8r$brf$1@is.intellij.net...
>>
>>>Any takers for writing a plugin to generate this automatically? Would be
>>>especially useful after having installed a few plugins with their own
>>
>>>mappings
>>>
>>>Niels
>>
>>
Hi all,
I have made some alternative layouts for discussion, should I post them
here as attachments or to the wiki? They are not fully consistent, just
to show the approaches.
rolf
Rolf Lohaus wrote:
"Rolf Lohaus" <rolf.lohaus@epost.de> a ?crit dans le message de news:
ar2ejg$4ft$1@is.intellij.net...
>
Well, I did not delve lately into OpenAPI, but whether it is available or
not through it, I guess the easiest way to get the correct keymap could be
to have a look at the keymap files in the user's IntelliJ config folder.
We'd simply have to parse an XML file.
On the FOP aspect of the story, I think it's a bit heavyweight. Certainly
iText would fit best for the task.
I've had problems with FOP in the past because of different versions of
packages, including or not including this and that classes because of
licence issues, and such...
In ~/.IntelliJIdea/config/options/, there is keymap.xml that tells wich
keymap is currently active.
And in ../config/keymaps/, there are the different available custom keymaps.
But only the overriden shortcuts are there.
We need first to know what are the default ones. And as far as I know, it's
not yet possible to have access to these default shortcuts through OpenAPI.
Am I wrong ? seomone ?
Guillaume
Hi Guillaume,
iText looks promising for the job. I will have a look next week, now I'm
off for the weekend.
best,
rolf
Guillaume Laforge wrote:
>>Yep, that would be really great and definitely the best solution.
>>Is it possible to get the actual keymapping with the Open API, I'm not
>>much into it?
>>I could generate the LaTeX source, but I think it is not possible for
>>everyone to process it to get the PDF. A better way would be to use
>>XSL-FO and FOP to directly produce a high quality PDF.
I will upload the examples on monday.
nice weekend,
rolf
Rolf Lohaus wrote:
"Rolf Lohaus" <rolf.lohaus@epost.de> a ?crit dans le message de news:
3DD4F689.1030907@epost.de...
>
>
So have a nice Week-end !
Guillaume
Hi all,
I have uploaded a new version with a few more keystrokes and some minor
rearrangements (thanks to Kendall Collett) and I also uploaded some
layout suggestions based an the feedback from this thread
(http://www.intellij.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/LayoutSuggestions). The
layouts are not fully consistent, just to show the idea.
What do you think, which one looks best and is most efficient/user-friendly?
regards,
rolf
Rolf Lohaus wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> I have made some alternative layouts for discussion, should I post
>> them here as attachments or to the wiki? They are not fully
>> consistent, just to show the approaches.
>>
>> rolf
#4. Or #2 with a bit more room after "+".
--
Best regards,
Mike Aizatsky.
-
JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
#2 preferred.
#3 least favorite.
Jon
Rolf Lohaus wrote:
#2 looks good.
#4 is too hard to read with the key contour
Guillaume
"Rolf Lohaus" <rolf.lohaus@epost.de> wrote in message
news:arb30k$hiv$1@is.intellij.net...
efficient/user-friendly?
I think #3 is best, distantly followed by #2. The others aren't even in the
running.
/Jonas