An enterprise bean must not attempt to listen on a socket, accept connections on a socket, or use a socket for multicast. The EJB architecture allows an enterprise bean instance to be a network socket client, but it does not allow it to be a network server. Allowing the instance to become a network server would conflict with the basic function of the enterprise bean-- to serve the EJB clients. -
I admit disallowing the whole java.net package usage was oversimplification. Will be fixed in #633, thank you for report.
-- regards, Alexey Kudravtsev. JetBrains, Inc http://www.intellij.com "Develop with pleasure!"
P.S Could you please post EJB related message into the jetbrains.intellij.eap.j2ee group?
Hello Scott, Please see Sun EJB Spec at http://java.sun.com/products/ejb/docs.html Chapter 24.1.2: -------- An enterprise bean must not attempt to listen on a socket, accept connections on a socket, or use a socket for multicast. The EJB architecture allows an enterprise bean instance to be a network socket client, but it does not allow it to be a network server. Allowing the instance to become a network server would conflict with the basic function of the enterprise bean-- to serve the EJB clients. ---------
>
I admit disallowing the whole java.net package usage was
oversimplification.
Will be fixed in #633, thank you for report.
>
-- regards, Alexey Kudravtsev. JetBrains, Inc http://www.intellij.com "Develop with pleasure!"
>
P.S Could you please post EJB related message into the jetbrains.intellij.eap.j2ee group?
Hello Scott,
Please see Sun EJB Spec at http://java.sun.com/products/ejb/docs.html
Chapter 24.1.2:
-
An enterprise bean must not attempt to listen on a socket, accept
connections on a socket, or
use a socket for multicast.
The EJB architecture allows an enterprise bean instance to be a network
socket client, but it does not
allow it to be a network server. Allowing the instance to become a network
server would conflict with
the basic function of the enterprise bean-- to serve the EJB clients.
-
I admit disallowing the whole java.net package usage was oversimplification.
Will be fixed in #633,
thank you for report.
--
regards,
Alexey Kudravtsev.
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
P.S Could you please post EJB related message into the
jetbrains.intellij.eap.j2ee group?
"Scott Curtis" <scurtis@smart421.com> wrote in message
news:afrni8$o3h$1@is.intellij.net...
>
it
showing
any
>
>
>
Sorry about posting here. Don't know why I did that? Thanks for the info.
"Alexey Kudravtsev" <cdr@intellij.com> wrote in message
news:afrv29$5nj$1@is.intellij.net...
>
oversimplification.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>