[Ann] BashSupport 0.9.5-maia
Hi,
a new release is now available.
The plugin page is http://plugins.jetbrains.net/plugin/?idea&id=4230 .
This time there are quite a few new features included.
Feedback on the script runner and the code formatter are highly appreciated.
The changes are:
- Run configuration for Bash scripts. You can now run the scripts from within IntelliJ
- Basic code formatter, not yet configurable (experimental, use at your own risk)
- New inspection: Check for missing file in inclusion (". missingFile")
- New inspection: Detect recursive file inclusions (". a.sh" in file a.sh)
- New inspection: Detect double function definitions
- New highlighting option for built-in variables
- Variable renaming now works again
- Compatibility with the other IntelliJ editions.
- Several parser and lexer improvements
Regards,
Wallaby
请先登录再写评论。
Very nice, thank you.
Do you have any plans to make a similar plug-in for BAT files?
Hi,
I don't have any plans to write a plugin for Windows batch files.
Isn't there a plugin for this already?
Regards,
Wallaby
what the problem with current batch plugin?
http://code.google.com/p/idea-batch/downloads/list
all feature/bug requests are welcome: http://code.google.com/p/idea-batch/issues/list
There seems to be a very old one:
http://plugins.intellij.net/plugin/?idea&id=265
but not as nice as your Bash plug-in .
Let's see:
- it's not in the jetbrains plug-in repository, so nobody knows about it.
- it's not visible in the IntelliJ available plug-ins dialog for download.
If the user does a search here (and most users look there for plug-ins or plug-ins wishes): http://plugins.intellij.net/
it won't be able to find your plug-in.
> - it's not in the jetbrains plug-in repository, so nobody knows about it.
???
it is definitely there
you've just yourself posted a link
http://plugins.intellij.net/plugin/?idea&id=265
> - it's not visible in the IntelliJ available plug-ins dialog for download.
it is there
but not last version
that's mostly because nobody asks about updating it
To me it looked like a totally different plug-in - the one from the repository looked like an abandoned one, and that from google code like a new one .
(since the SVN changes are from 2009)
Oh, yes, I see. Most users don't even look at old plug-ins since they're known to crash with new IntelliJ versions.