JSP files and build 3326

Opening up a standard format JSP file in the editor pegs my cpu until I close the file.
It appears to be expecting my jsp file to be valid XML, but I am not using the xml syntax.

Also, in the project panel with the J2EE tab selected and "Show as Deployment view" enabled, all the jsp files are named "JspClass".

0

Hi,

You mean jsp file that consists just of <% %>?

Tim Haley wrote:

Opening up a standard format JSP file in the editor pegs my cpu until I close the file.
It appears to be expecting my jsp file to be valid XML, but I am not using the xml syntax.

Also, in the project panel with the J2EE tab selected and "Show as Deployment view" enabled, all the jsp files are named "JspClass".



--
Best regards,
Maxim Mossienko
IntelliJ Labs / JetBrains Inc.
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

0

The last couple builds, including 3326, have been unusable for jsp editing
for me. IDEA "hangs" several seconds between every keystroke.

"Tim Haley" <no_mail@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:29146089.1115403293954.JavaMail.itn@is.intellij.net...

Opening up a standard format JSP file in the editor pegs my cpu until I
close the file.
It appears to be expecting my jsp file to be valid XML, but I am not using
the xml syntax.

>

Also, in the project panel with the J2EE tab selected and "Show as
Deployment view" enabled, all the jsp files are named "JspClass".



0

Yes, JSP files with standard JSP syntax including scriptlets of the form <% ... %>. See http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/syntax/1.1/syntaxref11.html

We have not yet migrated to XML syntax for our jsp files since WebLogic 7.0.4.0 does not support it.

0

The last few builds have definitely slowed down my jsp editing, but hasn't made it completely unusable until now.

0

3326 has jsp support mostly rewritten and there are numerous quirks indeed.
That should have been mentioned in released notes probably. Sorry guys.

-


Maxim Shafirov
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"


0

Can you give some guidance on when JSP 2.0 support will be available for
.jsp files?

Maxim Shafirov (JetBrains) wrote:

3326 has jsp support mostly rewritten and there are numerous quirks
indeed. That should have been mentioned in released notes probably.
Sorry guys.

>

-------------------
Maxim Shafirov
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>
>

0

It's there more or less by modulus of possible exceptions and formatting
quirks.

-


Maxim Shafirov
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

Can you give some guidance on when JSP 2.0 support will be available
for .jsp files?

Maxim Shafirov (JetBrains) wrote:

>> 3326 has jsp support mostly rewritten and there are numerous quirks
>> indeed. That should have been mentioned in released notes probably.
>> Sorry guys.
>>
>> -


>> Maxim Shafirov
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"


0

OK. I will start reporting problems.

Maxim Shafirov (JetBrains) wrote:

It's there more or less by modulus of possible exceptions and
formatting quirks.

>

-------------------
Maxim Shafirov
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>
>> Can you give some guidance on when JSP 2.0 support will be available
>> for .jsp files?
>>
>> Maxim Shafirov (JetBrains) wrote:
>>
>>> 3326 has jsp support mostly rewritten and there are numerous quirks
>>> indeed. That should have been mentioned in released notes probably.
>>> Sorry guys.
>>>
>>> -


>>> Maxim Shafirov
>>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>
>
>

0

If it weren't for IDEADEV-1115, I would too. That bug makes build 3326 completely unusable for me.

0

Does that include processing of TEI classes? Symbols in local scope don't seem to be recognised in 3326 with the taglib I'm using (which I'm pretty sure has proper TEIs)

0

请先登录再写评论。