Seeing all the bugfixes in 834, 835, ... 842, is there a realisitic chance for us to see a public EAP build in the very near future (sorry, the latest builds were too unstable for me to be used in serious development)?
Seeing all the bugfixes in 834, 835, ... 842, is there a realisitic chance for us to see a public EAP build in the very near future (sorry, the latest builds were too unstable for me to be used in serious development)?
Tom
Perhaps this evening we will build 842.
Regards, Vladimir Kondratyev _____________________ JetBrains
Don't feel you need to do a build just because we're asking for one. I'd rather wait a little while to have a more stable build, than have one put out sooner.
Seeing all the bugfixes in 834, 835, ... 842, is there a realisitic chance for us to see a public EAP build in the very near future (sorry, the latest builds were too unstable for me to be used in serious development)?
>
Tom
>
Perhaps this evening we will build 842.
>
Regards, Vladimir Kondratyev _____________________ JetBrains
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:47:34 -0700, Ted Young wrote:
Don't feel you need to do a build just because we're asking for one. I'd rather wait a little while to have a more stable build, than have one put out sooner.
What are people finding unstable? I've had IDEA crash in ages, it did need to kill -9 it earlier today when it came unresponsive, but then the rest of the machine had gone lala as well for some reason...
-- ...turn to the light - don't be frightened by the shadows it creates, ...turn to the light - turning away could be a terrible mistake ...dream theater - the great debate
Yeah, I've been stable for a while. Anybody know the status of the EJB/webapp stuff? jetbrains warned it was broken several builds ago. Should we go back to testing that yet?
Seeing all the bugfixes in 834, 835, ... 842, is there a realisitic chance for us to see a public EAP build in the very near future (sorry, the latest builds were too unstable for me to be used in serious development)?
>
Tom
>
Perhaps this evening we will build 842.
>
Regards, Vladimir Kondratyev _____________________ JetBrains
The build is considered to be stable, if <50% of tests failed.
It might have been < 99 % !!!! ;) No, honestly, those EAP builds are of quite good quality. In fact, I use it for production every day, all day long ! Some rare times, I have to skip a build when there's some bad internal error, but otherwise, it's okay, keep up the good work Thanks !
I'm getting lots of NPEs at the PsiElementWrapper.findLeavesAt(). However, to be fair, I'm not sure whether it's due to the plugins that I have installed.
;ted
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue - Error during dispatching of java.awt.event.InvocationEvent[INVOCATION_DEFAULT,runnable=com.intellij.codeIns ight.d.a.co@1a0eece,notifier=null,catchExceptions=false,when=1057076980030] on sun.awt.windows.WToolkit@bd7723 2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue - IntelliJ IDEA (Aurora) Build #833 2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue - JDK: 1.4.1_02 2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue - VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue - Vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc. 2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue - OS: Windows 2000 2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue - Last Action: CloseEditor 2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue - java.lang.NullPointerException at org.intellij.psi.PsiElementWrapper.findLeavesAt(PsiElementWrapper.java:27) at org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.Intention.findAcceptedLeaf(Intention.java:64 ) at org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.Intention.isAvailable(Intention.java:54) at org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.Intention.isAvailable(Intention.java:39) at org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.AuroraIntentionAction.isAvailable(AuroraInte ntionAction.java:25) at com.intellij.codeInsight.d.a.cf.c(cf.java:57) at com.intellij.codeInsight.d.a.cf.b(cf.java:76) at com.intellij.codeInsight.d.a.co.run(co.java:1) at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(Unknown Source) at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source) at com.intellij.ide.t.a(t.java:78) at com.intellij.ide.t.dispatchEvent(t.java:30) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForHierarchy(Unknown Source) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(Unknown Source) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(Unknown Source) "Alexey Efimov" <aefimov@spklabs.com> wrote in message news:bds8og$n33$1@is.intellij.net...
I'll frame this :))) And will show it to my boss, then his will ask me "what is a red in test results?" :))
org.intellij.* is a clear indication that exception comes from a plugin. Idea uses only com.intellij.* classes.
Friendly, Dmitry
Ted Young wrote:
I'm getting lots of NPEs at the PsiElementWrapper.findLeavesAt(). However, to be fair, I'm not sure whether it's due to the plugins that I have installed.
;ted
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue - Error during dispatching of
ntionAction.java:25) at com.intellij.codeInsight.d.a.cf.c(cf.java:57) at com.intellij.codeInsight.d.a.cf.b(cf.java:76) at com.intellij.codeInsight.d.a.co.run(co.java:1) at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(Unknown Source) at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source) at com.intellij.ide.t.a(t.java:78) at com.intellij.ide.t.dispatchEvent(t.java:30) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForHierarchy(Unknown Source) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(Unknown Source) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(Unknown Source) "Alexey Efimov" <aefimov@spklabs.com> wrote in message news:bds8og$n33$1@is.intellij.net...
>> I'll frame this :))) >> And will show it to my boss, then his will ask me "what is a red in test >> results?" :)) >> >> -- >> Alexey Efimov, Software Engineer >> Sputnik Labs, >> http://www.spklabs.com >> "Mike Aizatsky" <mike@intellij.com> wrote in message >> news:bds6qt$h11$1@is.intellij.net... >> > The build is considered to be stable, if <50% of tests failed. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ...Joking... >> > >> > -- >> > Best regards, >> > Mike Aizatsky. >> > -
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 09:37:44 -0700, Ted Young wrote:
I'm getting lots of NPEs at the PsiElementWrapper.findLeavesAt(). However, to be fair, I'm not sure whether it's due to the plugins that I have installed.
Also - the Psi stuff isn't officially an Open API yet is it?
-- ...turn to the light - don't be frightened by the shadows it creates, ...turn to the light - turning away could be a terrible mistake ...dream theater - the great debate
Thomas Singer wrote:
Perhaps this evening we will build 842.
Regards,
Vladimir Kondratyev
_____________________
JetBrains
Don't feel you need to do a build just because we're asking for one. I'd
rather wait a little while to have a more stable build, than have one put out
sooner.
Thanks for all the great work, btw!
;ted
"Vladimir Kondratyev" <vova@intellij.net> wrote in message
news:bdpmhe$9ba$1@is.intellij.net...
>
>
>
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:47:34 -0700, Ted Young wrote:
What are people finding unstable? I've had IDEA crash in ages, it did
need to kill -9 it earlier today when it came unresponsive, but then the
rest of the machine had gone lala as well for some reason...
--
...turn to the light - don't be frightened by the shadows it creates,
...turn to the light - turning away could be a terrible mistake
...dream theater - the great debate
Yeah, I've been stable for a while. Anybody know the status of the EJB/webapp stuff? jetbrains warned it was broken several builds ago. Should we go back to testing that yet?
Hello,
Just for my interest, how JetBrains determine then new build is stable?
Thanks!
--
Alexey Efimov, Software Engineer
Sputnik Labs,
http://www.spklabs.com
"Vladimir Kondratyev" <vova@intellij.net> wrote in message
news:bdpmhe$9ba$1@is.intellij.net...
>
>
>
The build is considered to be stable, if <50% of tests failed.
...Joking...
--
Best regards,
Mike Aizatsky.
-
JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
"Mike Aizatsky" <mike@intellij.com> a ?crit dans le message de
news:bds6qt$h11$1@is.intellij.net...
It might have been < 99 % !!!! ;)
No, honestly, those EAP builds are of quite good quality.
In fact, I use it for production every day, all day long !
Some rare times, I have to skip a build when there's some bad internal
error, but otherwise, it's okay, keep up the good work Thanks !
Guillaume
I'll frame this :)))
And will show it to my boss, then his will ask me "what is a red in test
results?" :))
--
Alexey Efimov, Software Engineer
Sputnik Labs,
http://www.spklabs.com
"Mike Aizatsky" <mike@intellij.com> wrote in message
news:bds6qt$h11$1@is.intellij.net...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I'm getting lots of NPEs at the PsiElementWrapper.findLeavesAt(). However, to
be fair, I'm not sure whether it's due to the plugins that I have installed.
;ted
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue -
Error during dispatching of
java.awt.event.InvocationEvent[INVOCATION_DEFAULT,runnable=com.intellij.codeIns
ight.d.a.co@1a0eece,notifier=null,catchExceptions=false,when=1057076980030] on
sun.awt.windows.WToolkit@bd7723
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue -
IntelliJ IDEA (Aurora) Build #833
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue -
JDK: 1.4.1_02
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue -
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue -
Vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue -
OS: Windows 2000
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue -
Last Action: CloseEditor
2003-07-01 09:29:40,077 ERROR - com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue -
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.intellij.psi.PsiElementWrapper.findLeavesAt(PsiElementWrapper.java:27)
at
org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.Intention.findAcceptedLeaf(Intention.java:64
)
at org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.Intention.isAvailable(Intention.java:54)
at org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.Intention.isAvailable(Intention.java:39)
at
org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.AuroraIntentionAction.isAvailable(AuroraInte
ntionAction.java:25)
at com.intellij.codeInsight.d.a.cf.c(cf.java:57)
at com.intellij.codeInsight.d.a.cf.b(cf.java:76)
at com.intellij.codeInsight.d.a.co.run(co.java:1)
at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
at com.intellij.ide.t.a(t.java:78)
at com.intellij.ide.t.dispatchEvent(t.java:30)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForHierarchy(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(Unknown Source)
"Alexey Efimov" <aefimov@spklabs.com> wrote in message
news:bds8og$n33$1@is.intellij.net...
>
>
>
org.intellij.* is a clear indication that exception comes from a plugin.
Idea uses only com.intellij.* classes.
Friendly,
Dmitry
Ted Young wrote:
java.awt.event.InvocationEvent[INVOCATION_DEFAULT,runnable=com.intellij.codeIns
ight.d.a.co@1a0eece,notifier=null,catchExceptions=false,when=1057076980030]
org.intellij.psi.PsiElementWrapper.findLeavesAt(PsiElementWrapper.java:27)
org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.Intention.findAcceptedLeaf(Intention.java:64
org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.Intention.isAvailable(Intention.java:54)
org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.Intention.isAvailable(Intention.java:39)
org.intellij.codeInsight.intention.AuroraIntentionAction.isAvailable(AuroraInte
>> I'll frame this :)))
>> And will show it to my boss, then his will ask me "what is a red in test
>> results?" :))
>>
>> --
>> Alexey Efimov, Software Engineer
>> Sputnik Labs,
>> http://www.spklabs.com
>> "Mike Aizatsky" <mike@intellij.com> wrote in message
>> news:bds6qt$h11$1@is.intellij.net...
>> > The build is considered to be stable, if <50% of tests failed.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ...Joking...
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best regards,
>> > Mike Aizatsky.
>> > -
>> > JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software
>> > http://www.intellij.com
>> > "Develop with pleasure!"
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
--
Dmitry Lomov
IntelliJ Labs / JetBrains Inc.
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
Yes, it's a plugin (IntentionPlugin). I'll upload a new version soon. Actually I had a fix for this for quite some time.
Timur
Done. Here's the download link:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=80426&release_id=168933
Thanks!
With so many plugins, it's getting really hard to tell which plugin is causing
the problem...which makes it difficult to report the problem. :(
Thanks for the quick fix!
;ted
"Timur Zambalayev" <no_mail@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:26733444.1057082856318.JavaMail.itn@is.intellij.net...
hopefully the guys start as soon as possible with the new plugin-integration!
why haven't you released 842?
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 09:37:44 -0700, Ted Young wrote:
Also - the Psi stuff isn't officially an Open API yet is it?
--
...turn to the light - don't be frightened by the shadows it creates,
...turn to the light - turning away could be a terrible mistake
...dream theater - the great debate
Maybe because >= 50% of the tests failed ;)
Tom
There were no changes in the status of PSI API. It's not part of the officially released/published Open API.
I guess it for JDK 1.4.2 issue date thanks...
The fully deep test checking upcomming 704 and 842,
maybe :)))
--
Alexey Efimov, Software Engineer
Sputnik Labs,
http://www.spklabs.com
"Thomas Singer" <thomas.singer@NOregnisSPAM.de> wrote in message
news:om05gvcbue8trcc926bbujonnljjmjm1ep@4ax.com...
>
It's gotta be the Commander's fault. I keep telling them to take it out...
:)
"Thomas Singer" <thomas.singer@NOregnisSPAM.de> wrote in message
news:om05gvcbue8trcc926bbujonnljjmjm1ep@4ax.com...
>