JDK 1.4.2 is out
Link: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/download.html
/kesh
请先登录再写评论。
Link: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/download.html
/kesh
请先登录再写评论。
Thanks :)
In article <8hsnfvcsbajtu6t962ol5smfcepf5kh2sq@4ax.com>, Thomas Singer wrote:
Downloading now ;) Sans NetBeans ( thankfully they had that option! )
Mark
I wonder what the heck NetBeans's doing there...
Guillaume
Ok, I explain you: java is a programming language. The Sun java 2 SDK SE is an SDK produced by Sun. Sun is also the main sponsor of an open source integrated development environment called NetBeans: that's free, and pretty useful if you don't want to pay for commercial licenses. Sun also produces a commercial IDE based on NetBeans called Sun ONE studio, and it has interest in attracting people to it: pushing new java developers into using NetBeans is a good way to do it, and an absolutely fair one, in my opinion: most of all, NetBeans is a good product. Of course someone (not one of the smarter ones..) could say something like "if I want an open source IDE I can use Eclipse", but this of course has no meaning with regard to the IDE that is bundled with sun's jdk, as bundling Eclipse with it would be against Sun commercial interests, and Sun has its own right to pursue its interests. Understood? Was it so difficult?
The question noone asked: the next IDEA build will be able to run on 1.4.2?
Any eugene (eugene is not a name anymore for me, it's just synonym for "jetbrains employee" :)) out there can tell us if you've been able to iron out the little problem you were having with 1.4.2? If yes, when could we expect to use IDEA with the new look&feels?
In article <bdh898$b29$1@is.intellij.net>, Guillaume Laforge wrote:
>> Downloading now ;) Sans NetBeans ( thankfully they had that option! )
We were just talking about that in #java on Undernet, the thought is
that if Sun are targetting all those VisualBasic people, they need to
have to have a "nice" visual development environent all bundled for them
to to use, rather than as a separate download.
Cause ya know - those Microsofties are kinda stupid :)
Mark
can use Eclipse"
I meant :
- if I want to download the last JDK, I go to the JDK download page,
- if I want to download NetBeans, I go to the NetBeans download page.
That's marketing, of course, but for me, NetBeans should not be on that JDK
download page !
Do you think I'm stupid ?
Did you eventually understood my question now ?
Is build 834+ coming out running on 1.4.2?
"kesh" <dummy@dummy.com> wrote in message
news:bdfog6$4k3$1@is.intellij.net...
>
>
Marcus Brito wrote:
Upcoming 834 will run under 1.4.2
Regards,
Vladimir Kondratyev
_____________________
JetBrains
And will actually contain 1.4.2 jre.
--
Best regards,
Eugene Zhuravlev
JetBrains, Inc, http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
"Marcus Brito" ]]> wrote in message
news:3938856.1056714990452.JavaMail.itn@is.intellij.net...
"jetbrains employee" :)) out there can tell us if you've been able to iron
out the little problem you were having with 1.4.2? If yes, when could we
expect to use IDEA with the new look&feels?
eugene... it is better than crazy ivan ;)
</offtopic>
834? I was hopping we'd get 838, at least, judging by the number of fixed
bugs in it... :)
Regards,
Andrei
>
>
Well, the exact number of the build that will be published is not known. So instead of 834 you should read "next publicly available
build"
--
Best regards,
Eugene Zhuravlev
JetBrains, Inc, http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
"Andrei Oprea" <aoprea@creditwave.com> wrote in message news:bdhlea$cak$1@is.intellij.net...
>
>
>
>
In article <bdhl6d$9c4$1@is.intellij.net>, Eugene Zhuravlev wrote:
>> Upcoming 834 will run under 1.4.2
As a separate download still I hope.
Much better, and Eugene Kondratyev didn't even noticed it -- must be used to it already. Think about it:
"Intelleugene IDEA, the best IDE around!"
"IntelliJ IDEA, the best for your eugene!"
"IntelliJ IDEA, simply eugene!"
"IntelliJ IDEA -- our eugenes are smarter than the others!"
I could keep that list for quite some lines, but I'll leave the rest to your imagination :)
Will there be a 1.4.2-compatible upgrade for the 3.0.x series of IDEA releases?
Thanks,
-jon
In article <15969642.1056738717146.JavaMail.itn@is.intellij.net>, Marcus Brito wrote:
"And in somewhat strange news - Software Development firm Jetbrains
formed a strategic allience with clothing manufacturer Levi Stauss
today, with a new advertising compaign centered around the slogon
"New Jeans for your Eugenes"
Mark
Eugene Zhuravlev wrote:
>>Upcoming 834 will run under 1.4.2
What about the 7XX builds? It would be nice to use it in the stable
release.
Yep, we are preparing 706.
--
Best regards,
Eugene Zhuravlev
JetBrains, Inc, http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
"Glen Stampoultzis" <gstamp@iprimus.com.au> wrote in message news:bdjjlt$rlr$1@is.intellij.net...
>
>
Actually I'm Zhuravlev, not Kondratyev :)
--
Best regards,
Eugene Zhuravlev
JetBrains, Inc, http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
I was talking about the Eugene who replied my post, the one who one day was called Vladimir :)
Ahh, got it :)
--
Best regards,
Eugene Zhuravlev
JetBrains, Inc, http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
"Marcus Brito" <pazu@animegaiden.com.br> wrote in message news:1461621.1056973941914.JavaMail.itn@is.intellij.net...
>
Hey Eugene,
You guys are not blocking Mac users again with this 1.4.2 support are you?
You WILL still work with 1.4.1 JRE if needed right???
R
We'll investigate whether it will be a safe upgrade and decide then.
Anyway, it should not matter what is IDEA's runtime.
--
Best regards,
Eugene Zhuravlev
JetBrains, Inc, http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
"Jon Bodner" <jon@bodnerfamily.com> wrote in message news:33490807.1056746079211.JavaMail.itn@is.intellij.net...
>
>
>
Just checked the code. Everything is all right.
--
Best regards,
Eugene Zhuravlev
JetBrains, Inc, http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
"Robert S. Sfeir" <robert@codepuccino.com> wrote in message news:bdpo2s$cq6$1@is.intellij.net...
>
>
>
>
Ok I can start breathing now, thanks :)
R
"Eugene Zhuravlev" <jeka@intellij.com> wrote in message
news:bdpovc$emm$1@is.intellij.net...
>
>
>
>
news:bdpo2s$cq6$1@is.intellij.net...
you?
>
>