IDEs Support (IntelliJ Platform) | JetBrains

Hani Suleiman

Total activity 1008
Last activity October 07, 2017 00:34
Member since October 10, 2002 03:55
Following 0 users
Followed by 0 users
Votes 0
Subscriptions 380

Created December 11, 2004 01:44

I don't, and I am truly baffled by people who choose to have layouts that do not mirror the 'runtime' layout.I've never figured out why anyone would go out of their way to use a stupid layout like ...
- 0 votes
Created January 15, 2005 16:14

Ahahaha!Apologies to everyone for not jumping in on this (I usually just monitor the EAP forums), but my oh my, where does one start!Ilias, I have some tips for you that you should try to incorpora...
- 0 votes
Created January 22, 2005 04:36

Ilias, if you're as good as you claim to be, why don't you just go find a job somewhere?Exactly what would it take for you to go away and stop posting your gibberish, out of curiousity? I mean, it'...
- 0 votes
Created March 22, 2005 20:46

Missorted modifersNo! This has no impact on anything, so why not allow people to use whatever order they feel is natural to them? Static method referenced via subclasspretty common pattern, so enf...
- 0 votes
Created June 29, 2005 11:07

Never! Just look at how useful aspectJ support is!Sorry, it's a joke that refuses to die.
- 0 votes
Created July 29, 2005 21:57

Very briefly (there are tons of tutorials out there covering this):A J2EE application consists of modules. Modules are of 3 different types, application clients (eg, swing frontends), web modules (...
- 0 votes
Created February 07, 2006 12:41

My objection is more philosophical than practical, but is there much demand for an enhanced EJB2 entity view? I'm an EJB2 entity user (one of the few few remaining ones), and I don't see anyone car...
- 0 votes
Created October 21, 2005 16:27

The par concept is gone, ejb archives are the same as any other archive, and persistence classes can be in any jar file, so there is no par module type needed anymore.The one thing I don't see ther...
- 0 votes
Created April 12, 2006 16:05

I think that'd cover it, given that it's probably not possible to have jasper be aware of includes. Though really, a nicer solution would be to have the validator use the exact same mechanism that ...
- 0 votes
Created April 12, 2006 21:57

I'll keep an eye on any examples of this I might come across. I tried but so far have failed to find any (which I guess is a good thing for me as a user, bad thing for you as a developer hoping to ...
- 0 votes