Dmitry is there a reason webapps don't have a module to define? Is this coming?
R
Dmitry Lomov (JetBrains) wrote:
Thomas Singer wrote:
>>What is the Module option used for in the Run/Debug Configurations? >> >>Shouldn't it be possible to set an application's (== Run/Debug >>Configuration) class path independent of the module?
>>Shouldn't it be possible to set an application's (== Run/Debug >>Configuration) class path independent of the module?
Why it should be possible?
Because the Run classpath might also contain resource directories, that are not necessary to compile (= module class path) and seem to confuse IDEA at the moment.
>>>Shouldn't it be possible to set an application's (== Run/Debug >>>Configuration) class path independent of the module? >> >> Why it should be possible?
Because the Run classpath might also contain resource directories, that are not necessary to compile (= module class path) and seem to confuse IDEA at the moment.
Add these as a library to a module that needs them.
Dmitry -- Dmitry Lomov IntelliJ Labs / JetBrains Inc. http://www.intellij.com "Develop with pleasure!"
I'm pretty sure there is a SCR for this. We run into this all the time because we have a series of servers that operate as a service-provider environment. The same server can be started with a different directory for the its resources and thus be configured. But idea only allows the adding of resource directories at a global level (project/module) -- not at the run/debug level. The ability to specify an additional classpath at the run/debug level could have many uses. The above is one. The ability to swap on and off aspects could be another
Thomas Singer wrote: >>> Shouldn't it be possible to set an application's (== Run/Debug >>> Configuration) class path independent of the module? >> >> >> Why it should be possible?
Because the Run classpath might also contain resource directories, that are not necessary to compile (= module class path) and seem to confuse IDEA at the moment.
Thomas Singer wrote:
Why it should be possible?
Friendly,
Dmitry
--
Dmitry Lomov
IntelliJ Labs / JetBrains Inc.
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
Dmitry is there a reason webapps don't have a module to define? Is this
coming?
R
Dmitry Lomov (JetBrains) wrote:
>>What is the Module option used for in the Run/Debug Configurations?
>>
>>Shouldn't it be possible to set an application's (== Run/Debug
>>Configuration) class path independent of the module?
>>Shouldn't it be possible to set an application's (== Run/Debug
>>Configuration) class path independent of the module?
Because the Run classpath might also contain resource directories, that
are not necessary to compile (= module class path) and seem to confuse
IDEA at the moment.
Tom
Thomas Singer wrote:
>>>Shouldn't it be possible to set an application's (== Run/Debug
>>>Configuration) class path independent of the module?
>>
>> Why it should be possible?
Add these as a library to a module that needs them.
Dmitry
--
Dmitry Lomov
IntelliJ Labs / JetBrains Inc.
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
But this confuses IDEA: classes/packages from these directories are not
displayed any more in the project/package view!
Tom
... which makes IDEA 963 again unusable for our projects :(
Tom
I'm pretty sure there is a SCR for this. We run into this all the time
because we have a series of servers that operate as a service-provider
environment. The same server can be started with a different directory
for the its resources and thus be configured. But idea only allows the
adding of resource directories at a global level (project/module) -- not
at the run/debug level. The ability to specify an additional classpath
at the run/debug level could have many uses. The above is one. The
ability to swap on and off aspects could be another
Thomas Singer wrote:
>>> Shouldn't it be possible to set an application's (== Run/Debug
>>> Configuration) class path independent of the module?
>>
>>
>> Why it should be possible?